4:11 pm - Tuesday January 25, 6794

REVEALED:BRITISH Destruction of Commonwealth Citizens’ Mythological Truth…UK Royal Family aware of Conspiracy*Queen Elizabeth II betrayed her Oath of Allegiance to Commonwealth during Coronation*Enoch Powell championed ‘Rivers of Blood’ campaign to enslave Commonwealth citizens

REVEALED:
BRITISH Destruction of Commonwealth Citizens'
 Mythological Truth...  UK Royal Family aware of Conspiracy

*Queen Elizabeth II betrayed her Oath of Allegiance to Commonwealth during 
Coronation 
*Enoch Powell championed 'Rivers of Blood' campaign to enslave 
Commonwealth citizens
*Met Police Investigates Tory MP Powell in death as Member of Westminster Pedophile
 Network
*'Powell was involved in Satanic Ritual Abuse, Sex Ring'-Anglican Bishop, Rt Rev
 Paul Butler 
*British Press condemns Conservative Party, Powell's Immigration Hate Speech  

QUOTES: 'Mind Superiority is derangement of Inferiority'-Her Knowledgeable 
Prof. Alexia Thomas
* 'We the people of United Nations determined to reaffirm faith in fundamental 
human
 rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of
 men and women
 and nations large and small...'-United   Nations Charter
* 'That anyone who possess power has a tendency to abuse it is an eternal truth. 
They tend to go as far as the  barriers will allow'-Montesquieu
* 'Injustice anywhere, is a threat to justice everywhere'-Martin Luther King Jr
Professor Alexia Thomas
BY OUR REPORTERNONE are more hopelessly enslaved than those falsely
 believe they are free,” postulated Johann Wolfgung von
 Goethe (1749-1832). Enoch Powell, a member of the
 Order of Parliament Empire, MPE, who represented
 the Conservative Government in United Kingdom, UK, even in 
death is still being judged by his false believe that he was free, as his
 evil works against humanity through his notorious 'Rivers of Blood' hate 
speech delivered to a General Meeting of the West Midlands Area 
Conservative Political Party in Birmingham on April 20, 1968 as well 
as his established lustful sexual orgies in pedophile   escapades have
 come intensely under Metropolitan Police investigation recently.
 Sure, Enoch is not 'Resting in Peace, but in Pains', 
having hopelessly enslaved himself in infamy.

 Like Monstesquieu, a  great philosopher pontificated: “That anyone who 
possesses power has a tendency to abuse it is an eternal truth. They tend to go
 as far as the barriers will allow,” this statement aptly captured the minds of Enoch
 who forgot Law 38 in Robert Green's 48 Laws of Power which states that
 “...But the human tongue is a beast that few can master. It strains constantly to
 break out of its cage, and if it is not tamed, it will turn wild and cause you grief.”
 After few decades in the hallowed British parliament, this critique of Commonwealth
 Immigration and anti-discrimination legislature was shamefully sacked from the
 shadow cabinet by Conservative Party leader, Edward Heath for  breaking the laws 
of mankind, humanity and freedom for the Commonwealth people. 

Heath, then a Conservative Leader firmly stated that Commonwealth citizens and 
immigrants are not inferior, as there was equality, no segregation, no first class or
 second class citizens.  Heath said: “The third element of the Conservative Party's
 policy is that all who are in this country as citizens should be equal before the law
 and that there shall be no discrimination or difference made between them by public
 authority. We will have no 'first-class citizens' and 'second-class citizens.”


From 1947 when world powers reached out to the British Kingdom to give freedom
 to the Commonwealth people,     same time enemies of the black people were afraid
 that freedom for the coloured people would mean Commonwealth   citizens would
 become more knowledgeable to becoming independent nations of their own, that 
was why Powell under the direct authority of the British Monarchy orchestrated 
schemes and plans to stop this much-expected freedom.  



UK Destruction of Commonwealth Citizens' Mythological Truth Unveiled

British Monarchy as represented by Queen of England had given tacit support to 
Enoch in their regular grand plans to enslave and extinct the Commonwealth people,
 that was the reason the British Queen as Head of Commonwealth betrayed her Oath
 of Allegiance to Commonwealth nations made during her coronation. Till date, the
 British authourity have whittled down, expunge majority of  International laws of 
Human Rights' Treaty in Commonwealth statutes in   their constitution called
 'Commonwealth Charter' which contains no substance. It evidently revealed an 
evil plan the UK authourity to destroy the Commonwealth citizens' mythological
 beliefs by ensuring freedom is taken away from  them perpetually, while the 
Commonwealth people forever assume servants-hood and slavery status.


For fear of freedom for the Commonwealth people, Enoch said: “ In this country
 in 15 or 20 years' time the black     man will have the whip hand over the white man.
  In 15 or 20 years, on present trends, there will be in this country     three and a 
half million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure.
 That is the official  figure given to parliament by the spokesman of the Registrar
 General's Office. There is no comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it 
must be in the region of five to seven million, approximately one-tenth of the 
whole population, and approaching that of Greater London. Of course, it will 
not be evenly distributed from Margate to Aberystwyth and from Penzance to
 Aberdeen. Whole areas, towns and parts of towns across England will be 
occupied by sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population. 
As time goes on, the proportion of this total who are immigrant descendants, those
 born in England, who arrived here by exactly the same route as the rest of us, will 
rapidly increase. Already by 1985
 the native-born would constitute the majority. It is this fact which creates the extreme 
urgency of action now, of just that kind of action which is hardest for politicians to take, 
action where the difficulties lie in the   present but the evils to be prevented or minimized 
lie several parliaments ahead. The answers to the simple and rational question are equally
 simple and rational: by stopping, or virtually stopping, further inflow, and by promoting
 the   maximum outflow. Both answers are part of the official policy of the Conservative Party. 

 

“All credit to John Stonehouse for having had the insight to perceive that, and the courage to say it. For these dangerous and divisive elements the legislation proposed in the Race Relations Bill is the very pabulum they need to flourish. Here is the means of showing that the immigrant communities can organize to consolidate their members, to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to overawe and dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant and the ill-informed have provided. As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see “the River Tiber foaming with much blood

 

“They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted. They now learn that a one-way privilege is to be established by act of parliament; a law which cannot, and is not intended to, operate to protect them or redress their grievances is to be enacted to give the stranger, the disgruntled and the agent-provocateur the power to pillory them for their private actions.

In the hundreds upon hundreds of letters I received when I last spoke on this subject two or three months ago, there was one striking feature which was largely new and which I find ominous. All Members of Parliament are used to the typical anonymous correspondent; but what surprised and alarmed me was the high proportion of ordinary, decent, sensible people, writing a rational and often well-educated letter, who believed that they had to omit their address because it was dangerous to have committed themselves to paper to a Member of Parliament agreeing with the views I had expressed, and that they would risk penalties or reprisals if they were known to have done so. The sense of being a persecuted minority which is growing among ordinary English people in the areas of the country which are affected is something that those without direct experience can hardly imagine. This does not mean that the immigrant and his descendent should be elevated into a privileged or special class or that the citizen should be denied his right to discriminate in the management of his own affairs between one fellow-citizen and another or that he should be subjected to imposition as to his reasons and motive for behaving in one lawful manner rather than another. It almost passes belief that at this moment 20 or 30 additional immigrant children are arriving from overseas in Wolverhampton alone every week – and that means 15 or 20 additional families a decade or two hence. Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre. So insane are we that we actually permit unmarried persons to immigrate for the purpose of founding a family with spouses and fiancés whom they have never seen.”

 

‘Queen Elizabeth, give freedom to Commonwealth People or get Disband’-Prof. Alexia Thomas

“Each time a person stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, these ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance,”philosophized Robert Kennedy. Posterity will remember Professor Alexia Thomas, Chairman, The Commonwealth Liberation, TCLP a British registered political party for good in her fight against dehumanization, deportation and abuse of the Commonwealth people, as captured by this inspiring philosophy of Robert which over the years has been continual and is continuum in seeing the coloured people walk free-enjoy ultimate freedom.

 

Alexia, a passionate British human Rights activist explained that Queen Elizabeth II should give freedom to the Commonwealth citizens in 10 days or get disband. Her words: “After I have woken up from my sleep. As a defender of the Universe and here physically on earth to give the Commonwealth people their freedom, I had answers this morning and I was told the Queen (Queen Elizabeth II-the Royal Monarch) should declare freedom for the Commonwealth nations, or get ready to loose her Commonwealth status. Else, her Commonwealth will have to disband; British will be ready to be an island of its own. And all the Commonwealth nations will go their separate ways. The intriguing thing about this revelation was: the destruction of the Commonwealth, the dehumanization of the Commonwealth, the abuse of the Commonwealth, the cheating of the Commonwealth, the blood of the Commonwealth and enslavement of the Commonwealth did not start today. It was clearly engineered in 1962. After Britain was going to go under the government of the German. Britain saw that were there colonists, but the Germans threatened to take over the Kingdom of Great Britain, seen Great Britain loose their won Sovereignty. That led to the alliance with other world power. That it was fair enough for Great Britain to give Independence to her Commonwealth people. When this Independence was been given to the Commonwealth people, the headship of the Conservative Government threatened that Commonwealth citizens becoming free slaves at last might one day become masters of their own. So in that attempt, they carefully and pre-meditatedly engineered a scheme. That scheme was geared at the depowering Commonwealth people civilization enrichment. This monstrous, dehumanization plan upon the black people, was carefully engineered in 1947 when the white man and other world powers started convincing the British Kingdom to give freedom to her Commonwealth. The British Kingdom feared the Commonwealth nations becoming knowledgeable to been uprising to become a nation of their own. The masters felt that if they allow the Commonwealth nations to go, these Commonwealth citizens will be more knowledgeable to rule themselves. For that reason the white man carefully, thoughtfully, deceitfully prepare the constitution for them.

 

The did not give them (Britain) their statute of authority,they did not give them Court Judgments for them to go and use those knowledge to manage themselves. They did not give them their words of authority. It was them that the white man. It was the the white man made a war of dehumanization against the black man. In their assembly they said ‘One day the black man will take the whip off them and the black man will whip them heavily. So, for the blackman not to take the whip away from them and whip them heavily, they saw future challenges. I meant to say future where they would no longer be able to exploit their colonies, they saw feature where their colonies will be friends and alliance with them. They did not want their colonies to be in alliance with them because they felt supremacy was a gift they own. They felt supremacy was a gift of their own authority. They could never have imagined them and black people having equability. In 1962, Conservative Government instituted a monstrous law. The monstrous law engineered deportation. The blackmen who were wise to have challenged them got deported. The blackmen who wants to be their fool stayed behind. That was how the eyes of the blackmen were blinded. I repeat, the white men felt ‘how do we depower coloured people civilization enrichment’ since superiority was owned to them. They felt the future of greatness of the black nation. They could not imagine that the servants will one day become masters of their own. They could not imagine that the servants will one day say to their masters get off my back. The white man in their illicit and illusional grandiosity to continue to enslave the blackman, God gave white man wisdom, God gave the blackman strength. The blackman is gullible, the white man is intelligent. It is important to say here that the white man is so lazy, he finds it difficult to work but enjoy the continually the services of been master having slaves to wipe their ass, to carry their stools, carry their faeces and wash their feet. They could not imagine that one day they shall be there to do all these things by themselves. So they engineered a coup-plot class that would see them depower the coloured people civilization enrichment.

 

That was why in 1962, Conservative Government t signed in Deportation as a law. That was why in 1962, Immigration Act was passed as law. Labour Government-the opposition government saw the atrocities committed against the people, it said to the Conservative party-that was a monstrous law. Same year, Labour Government reminded Conservative Government how opposition government challenged them seriously. That was when the Commonwealth Immigrant Act 1962 was passed. The law was so annoying because Conservative Government tightens the regulation of their border, permitting only those with only government-issued employment vouchers limited in number to settle. And the leader of the Opposition Govt said cruel and anti-brutal coloured legislation should be the name of Commonwealth Immigrant Act 1962. Today, I declare before my people of the Commonwealth, today I say before my people of the Commonwealth, the decision of your freedom means yours now. It is simply your now. The only reason, why in 1962 Conservative Government brought deportation order into enactment as a law was because of the treat. Now that the blackman is wise, blackman will no longer listen to them. And if the blackman does not listen to them, meaning the blackman will steal the idea and become a treasure to himself. For that reason, they made up their minds to know which blackmen will stay in their land and garden of treasure. They decide, any black man who will not listen to them, are either killed or destroyed. The black men that play fool to them are aloud to stay. That is why they initiated constitution to control the Commonwealth people. I came back through the voice of the Queen, gave Independence to the Commonwealth through unlocking the code of knowledge which is freedom and authority.”

 

TCLP issued Queen Elizabeth 10 days to Comply or else…

Sounding very angry, Alexia stated: “I say to the the present Queen that she has 10 days to come out and make a speech to our Commonwealth nation. She needs to reaffirm freedom and every hinges of law that depower coloured people civilization arrangement, she needs to be ready to declare war against her Sovereignty, her nation who wants to bring her kingdom to shame. If the Queen do not make a declaration and give our Commonwealth nation freedom, by taking away the hinges and barriers that dehumanized them, that made them 3rd class citizens, then the Queen should be ready to loose all her Commonwealth nation. For the first time, the black will now go their own way. 53 countries of Commonwealth will go their own way. The Queen and her kingdom will be on their own. The blackman will no longer be a fool, the blackman will no longer be a servant, the blackman will no longer be a slave, the blackman wants to be an alliance nation with the great kingdom empire. The blackman will only decide to be in alliance with the United Kingdom-not a third class war nation. If UK would not accept the Commonwealth nations as equal in their empire, the Queen should be ready to loose the Commonwealth nation.”

 

'Powell involved in Satanic Ritual Abuse, Sex Ring'-Anglican Bishop, Rt Rev Paul Butler 

 

Meanwhile, in a report earlier received by Scotland Yard in the custody of Metropolitan Police facts have indicated that Enoch Powell, the Conservative anti-immigrant firebrand, is being investigated as an alleged member of a claimed Westminster pedophile network after his name was supplied to police by a senior Anglican bishop.

The name of the late MP, one of the most divisive politicians of the late 20th century, was provided to Scotland Yard after a clergyman came forward with claims from the 1980s relating to ritual satanic abuse.

Powell, a maverick politician who achieved notoriety with his so-called ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech decrying migration to Britain, is the latest senior Parliamentarian to be made the subject of police inquiries into an alleged Establishment sex rings.

The Metropolitan Police has several ongoing investigations relating to claims against suspected abusers, including the former Liberal MP Cyril Smith. Detectives are also investigating allegations against former Home Secretary Leon Brittan.

 

The Independent , a leading British tabloid understands that the claims against Powell were passed to police by the Right Reverend Paul Butler, the Bishop of Durham, more than a year ago, but that they have only now been made public.

 

 

FOR THE RECORDS: ENOCH POWELL’S SATANIC SPEECH UNEDITED BELOW

“The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature.

“One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: at each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.

“Above all, people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles and even for desiring troubles: “If only,” they love to think, “if only people wouldn’t talk about it, it probably wouldn’t happen. Perhaps this habit goes back to the primitive belief that the word and the thing, the name and the object, are identical.

“At all events, the discussion of future grave but, with effort now, avoidable evils is the most unpopular and at the same time the most necessary occupation for the politician. Those who knowingly shirk it deserve, and not infrequently receive, the curses of those who come after. A week or two ago I fell into conversation with a constituent, a middle-aged, quite ordinary working man employed in one of our nationalized industries.

“If I had the money to go, I wouldn’t stay in this country. I made some deprecatory reply to the effect that even this government wouldn’t last for ever; but he took no notice, and continued: “I have three children, all of them been through grammar school and two of them married now, with family. I shan’t be satisfied till I have seen them all settled overseas. In this country in 15 or 20 years’ time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.

“I can already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing? How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation?

“The answer is that I do not have the right not to do so. Here is a decent, ordinary fellow Englishman, who in broad daylight in my own town says to me, his Member of Parliament, that his country will not be worth living in for his children.

“I simply do not have the right to shrug my shoulders and think about something else. What he is saying, thousands and hundreds of thousands are saying and thinking – not throughout Great Britain, perhaps, but in the areas that are already undergoing the total transformation to which there is no parallel in a thousand years of English history.

“In 15 or 20 years, on present trends, there will be in this country three and a half million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure. That is the official figure given to parliament by the spokesman of the Registrar General’s Office.

“There is no comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it must be in the region of five to seven million, approximately one-tenth of the whole population, and approaching that of Greater London. Of course, it will not be evenly distributed from Margate to Aberystwyth and from Penzance to Aberdeen. Whole areas, towns and parts of towns across England will be occupied by sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population.

“As time goes on, the proportion of this total who are immigrant descendants, those born in England, who arrived here by exactly the same route as the rest of us, will rapidly increase. Already by 1985 the native-born would constitute the majority. It is this fact which creates the extreme urgency of action now, of just that kind of action which is hardest for politicians to take, action where the difficulties lie in the present but the evils to be prevented or minimized lie several parliaments ahead.

“The natural and rational first question with a nation confronted by such a prospect is to ask: “How can its dimensions be reduced?” Granted it be not wholly preventable, can it be limited, bearing in mind that numbers are of the essence: the significance and consequences of an alien element introduced into a country or population are profoundly different according to whether that element is 1 per cent or 10 per cent.

“The answers to the simple and rational question are equally simple and rational: by stopping, or virtually stopping, further inflow, and by promoting the maximum outflow. Both answers are part of the official policy of the Conservative Party.

“It almost passes belief that at this moment 20 or 30 additional immigrant children are arriving from overseas in Wolverhampton alone every week – and that means 15 or 20 additional families a decade or two hence. Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre. So insane are we that we actually permit unmarried persons to immigrate for the purpose of founding a family with spouses and fiancés whom they have never seen.

“Let no one suppose that the flow of dependants will automatically tail off. On the contrary, even at the present admission rate of only 5,000 a year by voucher, there is sufficient for a further 25,000 dependants per annum ad infinitum, without taking into account the huge reservoir of existing relations in this country – and I am making no allowance at all for fraudulent entry. In these circumstances nothing will suffice but that the total inflow for settlement should be reduced at once to negligible proportions, and that the necessary legislative and administrative measures be taken without delay.

“I stress the words “for settlement.” This has nothing to do with the entry of Commonwealth citizens, any more than of aliens, into this country, for the purposes of study or of improving their qualifications, like (for instance) the Commonwealth doctors who, to the advantage of their own countries, have enabled our hospital service to be expanded faster than would otherwise have been possible. They are not, and never have been, immigrants.

“I turn to re-emigration. If all immigration ended tomorrow, the rate of growth of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population would be substantially reduced, but the prospective size of this element in the population would still leave the basic character of the national danger unaffected. This can only be tackled while a considerable proportion of the total still comprises persons who entered this country during the last ten years or so.

“Hence the urgency of implementing now the second element of the Conservative Party’s policy: the encouragement of re-emigration. Nobody can make an estimate of the numbers which, with generous assistance, would choose either to return to their countries of origin or to go to other countries anxious to receive the manpower and the skills they represent.

 

 

“Nobody knows, because no such policy has yet been attempted. I can only say that, even at present, immigrants in my own constituency from time to time come to me, asking if I can find them assistance to return home. If such a policy were adopted and pursued with the determination which the gravity of the alternative justifies, the resultant outflow could appreciably alter the prospects.

“The third element of the Conservative Party’s policy is that all who are in this country as citizens should be equal before the law and that there shall be no discrimination or difference made between them by public authority. As Mr Heath has put it we will have no “first-class citizens” and “second-class citizens.” This does not mean that the immigrant and his descendent should be elevated into a privileged or special class or that the citizen should be denied his right to discriminate in the management of his own affairs between one fellow-citizen and another or that he should be subjected to imposition as to his reasons and motive for behaving in one lawful manner rather than another.

“There could be no grosser misconception of the realities than is entertained by those who vociferously demand legislation as they call it “against discrimination”, whether they be leader-writers of the same kidney and sometimes on the same newspapers which year after year in the 1930s tried to blind this country to the rising peril which confronted it, or archbishops who live in palaces, faring delicately with the bedclothes pulled right up over their heads. They have got it exactly and diametrically wrong.

“The discrimination and the deprivation, the sense of alarm and of resentment, lies not with the immigrant population but with those among whom they have come and are still coming. This is why to enact legislation of the kind before parliament at this moment is to risk throwing a match on to gunpowder. The kindest thing that can be said about those who propose and support it is that they know not what they do.

“Nothing is more misleading than comparison between the Commonwealth immigrant in Britain and the American Negro. The Negro population of the United States, which was already in existence before the United States became a nation, started literally as slaves and were later given the franchise and other rights of citizenship, to the exercise of which they have only gradually and still incompletely come. The Commonwealth immigrant came to Britain as a full citizen, to a country which knew no discrimination between one citizen and another, and he entered instantly into the possession of the rights of every citizen, from the vote to free treatment under the National Health Service. Whatever drawbacks attended the immigrants arose not from the law or from public policy or from administration, but from those personal circumstances and accidents which cause, and always will cause, the fortunes and experience of one man to be different from another’s.

“But while, to the immigrant, entry to this country was admission to privileges and opportunities eagerly sought, the impact upon the existing population was very different. For reasons which they could not comprehend, and in pursuance of a decision by default, on which they were never consulted, they found themselves made strangers in their own country.

“They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted. They now learn that a one-way privilege is to be established by act of parliament; a law which cannot, and is not intended to, operate to protect them or redress their grievances is to be enacted to give the stranger, the disgruntled and the agent-provocateur the power to pillory them for their private actions.

“In the hundreds upon hundreds of letters I received when I last spoke on this subject two or three months ago, there was one striking feature which was largely new and which I find ominous. All Members of Parliament are used to the typical anonymous correspondent; but what surprised and alarmed me was the high proportion of ordinary, decent, sensible people, writing a rational and often well-educated letter, who believed that they had to omit their address because it was dangerous to have committed themselves to paper to a Member of Parliament agreeing with the views I had expressed, and that they would risk penalties or reprisals if they were known to have done so. The sense of being a persecuted minority which is growing among ordinary English people in the areas of the country which are affected is something that those without direct experience can hardly imagine. I am going to allow just one of those hundreds of people to speak for me:

“Eight years ago in a respectable street in Wolverhampton a house was sold to a Negro. Now only one white (a woman old-age pensioner) lives there. This is her story. She lost her husband and both her sons in the war. So she turned her seven-roomed house, her only asset, into a boarding house. She worked hard and did well, paid off her mortgage and began to put something by for her old age. Then the immigrants moved in. With growing fear, she saw one house after another taken over. The quiet street became a place of noise and confusion. Regretfully, her white tenants moved out.

“The day after the last one left, she was awakened at 7am by two Negroes who wanted to use her ‘phone to contact their employer. When she refused, as she would have refused any stranger at such an hour, she was abused and feared she would have been attacked but for the chain on her door. Immigrant families have tried to rent rooms in her house, but she always refused. Her little store of money went, and after paying rates, she has less than £2 per week. “She went to apply for a rate reduction and was seen by a young girl, who on hearing she had a seven-roomed house, suggested she should let part of it. When she said the only people she could get were Negroes, the girl said, “Racial prejudice won’t get you anywhere in this country.” So she went home.

“The telephone is her lifeline. Her family pay the bill, and help her out as best they can. Immigrants have offered to buy her house – at a price which the prospective landlord would be able to recover from his tenants in weeks, or at most a few months. She is becoming afraid to go out. Windows are broken. She finds excreta pushed through her letter box. When she goes to the shops, she is followed by children, charming, wide-grinning piccaninnies. They cannot speak English, but one word they know. “Racialist,” they chant. When the new Race Relations Bill is passed, this woman is convinced she will go to prison. And is she so wrong? I begin to wonder.”

“The other dangerous delusion from which those who are wilfully or otherwise blind to realities suffer, is summed up in the word “integration.” To be integrated into a population means to become for all practical purposes indistinguishable from its other members.

“Now, at all times, where there are marked physical differences, especially of colour, integration is difficult though, over a period, not impossible. There are among the Commonwealth immigrants who have come to live here in the last fifteen years or so, many thousands whose wish and purpose is to be integrated and whose every thought and endeavour is bent in that direction. But to imagine that such a thing enters the heads of a great and growing majority of immigrants and their descendants is a ludicrous misconception, and a dangerous one.

“We are on the verge here of a change. Hitherto it has been force of circumstance and of background which has rendered the very idea of integration inaccessible to the greater part of the immigrant population – that they never conceived or intended such a thing, and that their numbers and physical concentration meant the pressures towards integration which normally bear upon any small minority did not operate. Now we are seeing the growth of positive forces acting against integration, of vested interests in the preservation and sharpening of racial and religious differences, with a view to the exercise of actual

domination, first over fellow-immigrants and then over the rest of the population. The cloud no bigger than a man’s hand, that can so rapidly overcast the sky, has been visible recently in Wolverhampton and has shown signs of spreading quickly. The words I am about to use, verbatim as they appeared in the local press on 17 February, are not mine, but those of a Labour Member of Parliament who is a minister in the present government:

‘The Sikh communities’ campaign to maintain customs inappropriate in Britain is much to be regretted. Working in Britain, particularly in the public services, they should be prepared to accept the terms and conditions of their employment. To claim special communal rights (or should one say rites?) leads to a dangerous fragmentation within society. This communalism is a canker; whether practiced by one colour or another it is to be strongly condemned.’

“All credit to John Stonehouse for having had the insight to perceive that, and the courage to say it. For these dangerous and divisive elements the legislation proposed in the Race Relations Bill is the very pabulum they need to flourish. Here is the means of showing that the immigrant communities can organize to consolidate their members, to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to overawe and dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant and the ill-informed have provided. As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see “the River Tiber foaming with much blood.”

“That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect. Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the century. Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now. Whether there will be the public will to demand and obtain that action, I do not know. All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.”

 

Do what you can, with what you have, where you are”-Theodore Roosevelt

 

Filed in: Nigeria

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply